Next-GenPSC Logo
    No more articles for these filters

    Iran Nuclear Crisis and India’s Role

    The US strike on Iran's Fordow nuclear facility and the E3's activation of the JCPOA snapback clause have reignited nuclear tensions, raising global energy and geopolitical risks. India faces a strategic balancing test amid sanctions threats, regional instability, and energy security concerns.

    Iran Nuclear Crisis and India’s Role

    Introduction

    The June-2025 U.S. strike on Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility and the E3’s activation of the snapback clause under the JCPOA have revived global concerns over nuclear proliferation and Middle-East stability. Iran’s threat to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) underscores a high-risk escalation cycle with major global and regional spillovers.

    Context & Background

    Iran’s enrichment beyond JCPOA limits, reduced IAEA cooperation, and US-Iran tensions post-2018 (US withdrawal from JCPOA) form the backdrop. The E3 — UK, France, Germany — triggered UN sanctions re-imposition citing non-compliance. Iran calls the move "illegal" and threatens NPT exit.

    Key Points

    • •Snapback Triggered by E3: UK-France-Germany invoked JCPOA snapback after Iran crossed highly enriched uranium thresholds and limited IAEA access.
    • •US Military Strike: U.S. strikes on Fordow mark a shift towards pre-emptive nuclear counter-proliferation doctrine.
    • •Iran’s Reaction: Condemned move, threatened NPT withdrawal, signalling strategy of nuclear ambiguity and regime security preservation.
    • •Geopolitical Polarisation: US frames crisis as non-proliferation integrity vs Iran’s sovereignty; China-Russia back Iran diplomatically to counter US hegemony.
    • •Regional Security Spiral: Gulf monarchies & Israel see existential threat → enhances risk of shadow war, proxy strikes & maritime escalation.
    • •Energy Shock Potential: 20% global oil flows via Hormuz → disruptions threaten global markets, inflation cycles, and shipping insurance spikes.
    • •Weaponisation of Energy: Russia & Gulf states gain leverage; energy deficit economies (India, Japan, EU) vulnerable.
    • •Multilateralism Stress-Test: JCPOA breakdown undermines arms-control diplomacy, UN credibility & IAEA effectiveness.
    • •Absence of IAEA Verification: No neutral inspections → strategic uncertainty & intelligence-driven escalation risk.
    • •Strategic Opacity as Bargaining: Iran uses deterrence ambiguity for negotiating leverage — key game-theory tactic.
    • •India's Strategic Stakes: Energy stability, diaspora safety, port access (Chabahar), counter-terror risk in extended neighbourhood.
    • •UPSC Mains Angle: Crisis illustrates Great-Power rivalry, West-Asia power realignment, energy-security geopolitics & limitations of sanctions diplomacy.

    Related Entities

    JCPOA (2015)
    Agreement

    Joint nuclear deal limiting Iran's enrichment; US exited in 2018.

    NPT
    Treaty

    Cornerstone non-proliferation treaty; Iran threatens withdrawal.

    IAEA
    Agency

    UN nuclear watchdog; inspection access central to crisis resolution.

    Impact & Significance

    • •Destabilisation of West-Asia’s security architecture.
    • •Risk of a new Middle-East nuclear race: Saudi Arabia, UAE, Turkey evaluating options.
    • •Global oil shock risks hurting emerging markets; strengthens energy diversification discourse.
    • •Possible weakening of global non-proliferation norms.

    Challenges & Criticism

    • •US unilateral dominance vs multipolar institutional reform demand.
    • •IAEA credibility weakened without inspection access.
    • •JCPOA seen as vulnerable to major-power domestic politics (US withdrawal 2018).
    • •Sanction-only approach risks proliferation backlash rather than containment.

    Future Outlook

    • •Return to diplomacy contingent on IAEA access + sanctions relief sequencing.
    • •China-Russia-Iran axis may deepen under SCO/BRICS.
    • •India’s balancing will intensify amid competing Quad and West-Asia diplomacy priorities.
    • •Energy transition acceleration via green hydrogen & long-term LNG contracts.

    UPSC Relevance

    UPSC
    • • GS-2: International institutions, India and neighborhood, global governance
    • • GS-3: Security challenges, energy security
    • • Essay: Multilateralism crisis, emerging multipolarity
    • • IR Current Affairs: India’s balancing diplomacy

    Sample Questions

    Prelims

    With reference to the Iran nuclear issue, consider the following:

    1. The JCPOA allows any participating state to trigger the snapback of UN sanctions.

    2. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) administers NPT safeguards.

    3. Only the United States can activate the snapback mechanism.

    Answer: Option 1, Option 2

    Explanation: Statement 3 is incorrect — any JCPOA member can trigger snapback.

    Mains

    Discuss the implications of the Iran nuclear crisis on global non-proliferation and energy security. How should India balance its strategic interests amid escalating US-Iran tensions?

    Introduction: The 2025 Iran nuclear crisis has revived fears of nuclear breakout, Middle-East escalation, and global energy disruption.

    Body:

    • Global Fallout: Erosion of JCPOA, NPT stress-test, regional security dilemma, oil shock risk, great-power competition.

    • India’s Stakes: Energy from Gulf (60% crude), Chabahar-INSTC, diaspora (8m), maritime security in Hormuz.

    • Indian Strategy: Quiet diplomacy, support for IAEA access, diversify energy imports (UAE, US LNG), maintain balanced ties with US & Iran, secure diaspora & SLOCs.

    Conclusion: India must pursue a calibrated, sovereignty-respecting and multilateralism-supporting approach to balance energy security, diaspora protection and regional stability.