Modern History Playlist
19 chapters • 0 completed
Advent of Europeans in India
10 topics
Decline of the Mughal Empire
7 topics
Emergence of Regional States
11 topics
Expansion and Consolidation of British Power
23 topics
British Government & Economic Policies (1757-1857)
7 topics
Social Reform Movements
24 topics
People’s Resistance before 1857
13 topics
The revolt of 1857
7 topics
Growth of Nationalism and Moderate Phase of Congress
9 topics
British Administration in India
9 topics
Era of Militant Nationalism (1905-1909)
6 topics
First Phase of Revolutionary Activities(1907-1917)
8 topics
India’s Response to First World War and Home Rule Movement
5 topics
Emergence of Gandhi
10 topics
Non-Cooperation Movement and Khilafat Movement
10 topics
Emergence of Swarajists, Socialist Ideas, Revolutionary Activities
8 topics
Struggle For Swaraj: 1928-1935
16 topics
Period from 1935-42
12 topics
Period from 1942-47
25 topics
Chapter 17: Struggle For Swaraj: 1928-1935
Chapter TestSimon Commission Report (1927–1930): The Boycott and Political Radicalization
The Simon Commission, appointed in 1927 , was intensely boycotted by most Indian political parties because of the complete exclusion of Indian members. The 1930 Report was strategically conservative, failing to grant Dominion Status. The protests against the Commission catalyzed the radicalization of Indian politics and led directly to the Congress’s demand for Purna Swaraj.
The Simon Commission, appointed in 1927 , was intensely boycotted by most Indian political parties because of the complete exclusion of Indian members. The 1930 Report was strategically conservative, failing to grant Dominion Status. The protests against the Commission catalyzed the radicalization of Indian politics and led directly to the Congress’s demand for Purna Swaraj.
Simon Commission Recommendations
| Aspect | Recommendation | Critical Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| Provincial Dyarchy | Abolish dyarchy; grant provincial autonomy | Governors retained special powers (veto) to undermine Indian ministers. |
| Central Government | No self-government; central control to remain British | A direct rejection of the Dominion Status demand. |
| Federal Assembly | Proposed with provinces and princely states | Designed to dilute nationalist strength by including loyal Princes. |
| Communal Representation | Continue and expand separate electorates | A political strategy to institutionalize division among Indians. |
Reactions to Simon Commission
| Group/Section | View | Strategic Context |
|---|---|---|
| Congress | Rejected ; demanded Purna Swaraj | Asserted India's right to frame its own constitution. |
| Muslim League (Jinnah) | Criticized for not protecting Muslim rights enough | Attempted to use the boycott to press for more safeguards. |
| Muslim League (Shafi) | Welcomed due to continuation of separate electorates | Supported the institutionalization of communal representation. |
| Princes | Interested in federation but cautious | Interested in maintaining their autonomy within a federal setup. |
Fun Facts
The Simon Commission protests spurred the formation of the Nehru Report (1928), as Indian leaders took up the challenge to draft their own constitution.
The fatal attack on Lala Lajpat Rai in Lahore inspired Bhagat Singh to kill Saunders in revenge.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Nehru Report (1928): India’s First Constitutional Blueprint
The Nehru Report of 1928 , drafted by a committee chaired by Motilal Nehru , was the first major attempt by Indians to draft a comprehensive constitutional framework. It was a direct response to the Simon Commission, but its recommendation for Dominion Status and the rejection of separate communal electorates caused a critical split with both the Muslim League and younger radical leaders (Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Bose).
The Nehru Report of 1928 , drafted by a committee chaired by Motilal Nehru , was the first major attempt by Indians to draft a comprehensive constitutional framework. It was a direct response to the Simon Commission, but its recommendation for Dominion Status and the rejection of separate communal electorates caused a critical split with both the Muslim League and younger radical leaders (Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Bose).
Key Recommendations of Nehru Report (1928)
| Aspect | Recommendation | Mains Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Dominion Status within British Commonwealth | Reflected moderate consensus; rejected by radical youth. |
| Communal Representation | Joint Electorates ; limited exceptions for Muslims | Directly led to Jinnah’s 14 Points and the breakdown of communal consensus. |
| Fundamental Rights | Guaranteed equality, freedom, association | First time such rights were demanded in an Indian constitutional document. |
| Franchise | Universal adult suffrage (gradual) | Highly progressive step for its time. |
| Provinces | Provincial autonomy , end of Dyarchy | Accepted as a necessary improvement over the 1919 Act. |
Reactions to Nehru Report and the Communal Dilemma
| Group/Section | Reaction | Strategic Position |
|---|---|---|
| Congress | Supported; Common framework for Dominion Status | Demonstrated Congress's willingness to lead constitutional drafting. |
| Muslim League (Jinnah) | Opposed vehemently | Rejected joint electorates; Formalised Muslim demands into 14 Points. |
| Radical Youth (Nehru, Bose) | Criticized the Dominion Status demand | Led to the eventual Purna Swaraj demand at the Lahore Session (1929). |
| Hindu Mahasabha | Supported | Supported the rejection of the separate electorates principle. |
Fun Facts
The committee drafting the Nehru Report met at the Nehru family residence in Allahabad, known as Anand Bhavan.
It was the first document in Indian history to formally demand and guarantee a list of Fundamental Rights.
The split between the radical youth (Jawaharlal) and the older generation (Motilal) was a key development that year.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Jinnah’s Fourteen Points (1929): Consolidating Communal Demands
Jinnah’s Fourteen Points , presented in March 1929 , were a direct, decisive response to the Nehru Report (1928) . They formally crystallized the Muslim League’s demands for constitutional safeguards, becoming the definitive basis for Muslim political strategy and the institutionalization of the communal divide until the Pakistan Resolution (1940) .
Jinnah’s Fourteen Points , presented in March 1929 , were a direct, decisive response to the Nehru Report (1928) . They formally crystallized the Muslim League’s demands for constitutional safeguards, becoming the definitive basis for Muslim political strategy and the institutionalization of the communal divide until the Pakistan Resolution (1940) .
Jinnah’s Fourteen Points (1929)
| No. | Demand | Strategic Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Federal constitution with provincial residuary powers | Maximize autonomy of Muslim-majority provinces. |
| 6 | Separate electorates to continue | Direct rejection of Nehru Report; institutionalize communal politics. |
| 10 | Sindh separated from Bombay Presidency | Secure geographical integrity of future political units. |
| 14 | One-third Muslim representation in Central Legislature | Demand for disproportionate weightage in central politics. |
| 13 | Protection of Muslim culture, education, language, religion | Emphasized religious identity as the basis for political rights. |
Fun Facts
The Fourteen Points became the 'charter of Muslim India' until the Lahore Resolution (1940).
Jinnah presented them to counterbalance the Nehru Report, strengthening his leadership in the Muslim League.
They were an attempt to reconcile the demands of various Muslim factions (especially between Punjab and Bengal Muslims).
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Civil Disobedience Movement: Significant Developments Before Launch (1927–1930)
The launch of the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) in 1930 was the culmination of a three-year period (1927–1930) marked by British constitutional betrayal, nationalist assertion, and the finalization of the Congress’s ultimate political goal. These developments set the perfect political and ideological stage for Mahatma Gandhi to launch his second nationwide mass struggle.
The launch of the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) in 1930 was the culmination of a three-year period (1927–1930) marked by British constitutional betrayal, nationalist assertion, and the finalization of the Congress’s ultimate political goal. These developments set the perfect political and ideological stage for Mahatma Gandhi to launch his second nationwide mass struggle.
Developments Before Civil Disobedience Movement
| Year | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| 1927 | Simon Commission appointed | All-White exclusion led to 'Simon Go Back' protests and radicalization. |
| 1928 | Nehru Report drafted | First Indian constitutional draft; demand for Dominion Status; rejected by Jinnah. |
| 1929 | Jinnah’s Fourteen Points | Consolidated Muslim League’s demands; formalized the Hindu–Muslim political divide. |
| 1929 | Lahore Session of Congress | Purna Swaraj declared as the goal; decision for Civil Disobedience under Gandhi. |
| 1930 (Jan) | Independence Day observed | Nationwide pledge taken; set the moral tone for the CDM. |
Fun Facts
The Congress adopted the tricolour flag (with the spinning wheel at the center) as the national flag during the Lahore Session (1929).
January 26 was observed as 'Independence Day' from 1930 onwards until it became Republic Day in 1950.
Jawaharlal Nehru , just 40 years old, presided over the historic Lahore Session.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Gandhi’s 11 Demands and the Salt March (1930): The Salt Satyagraha
The Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) formally began with Gandhi’s 11 demands (January 1930) and the historic Salt March (March–April 1930) . The demands strategically synthesized economic grievances into a unified political appeal. When Viceroy Lord Irwin ignored them , Gandhi launched the Salt Satyagraha, making the salt tax the central symbol of colonial exploitation and national defiance.
The Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) formally began with Gandhi’s 11 demands (January 1930) and the historic Salt March (March–April 1930) . The demands strategically synthesized economic grievances into a unified political appeal. When Viceroy Lord Irwin ignored them , Gandhi launched the Salt Satyagraha, making the salt tax the central symbol of colonial exploitation and national defiance.
Gandhi’s 11 Demands (The Strategic Appeal)
| No. | Demand | Target Group |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reduce expenditure on army and civil services. | Taxpayers/Middle Class |
| 2 | Lower rupee-sterling exchange ratio. | Indian Industry/Businessmen |
| 3 | Protect Indian textile industry from foreign competition. | Indian Industry/Businessmen |
| 4 | Levy customs duty on foreign cloth. | Indian Industry/Businessmen |
| 5 | Reduce land revenue by 50% and abolish zamindari system. | Peasants |
| 6 | Abolish salt tax and government salt monopoly. | General Public/Poor (Universal Appeal) |
| 7 | Reform currency and exchange system in favor of Indians. | Businessmen/Nationalist Economists |
| 8 | Release all political prisoners. | Political Class/Activists |
| 9 | Accept postal, telegraph and railway reforms. | General Public/Administration |
| 10 | Introduce prohibition of liquor. | Social Reformers/Women |
| 11 | Abolish the CID (Criminal Investigation Department) or control its methods. | Civil Liberties Activists/Political Class |
Salt March (1930) Summary
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Start | 12 March 1930, Sabarmati Ashram |
| End | 6 April 1930, Dandi (Law broken) |
| Distance/Duration | 240 miles in 24 days |
| Followers | 78 trusted satyagrahis initially |
| Symbolism | Salt: A universal necessity that revealed the immorality of colonial taxation. |
Fun Facts
The march gained worldwide attention, with *The New York Times* giving front-page coverage.
At each village, Gandhi addressed crowds, spreading awareness of swaraj and civil disobedience.
The salt made at Dandi was auctioned publicly to defy British law.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Why Gandhi Chose Salt & Spread of Salt Law Disobedience (1930)
Mahatma Gandhi's decision to launch the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) by breaking the salt law was a stroke of strategic brilliance. Salt, being a universal necessity, transformed the abstract political demand for Purna Swaraj into a concrete act of moral and economic defiance against the colonial state, leading to the rapid proliferation of the movement across India.
Mahatma Gandhi's decision to launch the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) by breaking the salt law was a stroke of strategic brilliance. Salt, being a universal necessity, transformed the abstract political demand for Purna Swaraj into a concrete act of moral and economic defiance against the colonial state, leading to the rapid proliferation of the movement across India.
Gandhi’s 11 Demands and Salt March (1930) Summary
| Aspect | Details | Mains Link |
|---|---|---|
| Salt Symbolism | Universal necessity; exposed British monopoly/tax. | Moral high ground ; ensured multi-class appeal. |
| 11 Demands | Included abolition of salt tax, 50% land revenue reduction, and political reforms. | Provided moral justification and a compromise formula to unite political and economic demands. |
| The March | 12 March – 6 April 1930 , Sabarmati to Dandi (240 miles). | Conversion of Purna Swaraj (abstract) into Mass Action (concrete). |
| Disobedience Spread | Vedaranyam March (C.R. Rajagopalachari), Payyanur Satyagraha (K. Kelappan), No-Tax Campaigns. | Demonstrated decentralization and local adaptation of the CDM to regional grievances. |
Spread of Salt Law Disobedience (Regional Actions)
| Region | Leader/Action | Nature of Disobedience |
|---|---|---|
| Tamil Nadu | C. Rajagopalachari | Vedaranyam Salt March and picketing |
| Malabar (Kerala) | K. Kelappan | Salt Satyagraha at Payyanur |
| North West Frontier Province (NWFP) | Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan (Frontier Gandhi) | Organized Khudai Khidmatgars (Red Shirts); non-violent defiance |
| Andhra Pradesh | Local leaders (Coastal districts) | Illegal salt manufacture and Forest Satyagrahas |
| Bihar | Rajendra Prasad and local leaders | No-Chowkidari Tax campaign (as salt making was not feasible inland) |
| Maharashtra/Gujarat | Sarojini Naidu, Sardar Patel | Salt manufacturing and the Dharasana Salt Works Raid (non-violent mass action) |
| United Provinces (UP) | Jawaharlal Nehru | Intense No-Revenue/No-Rent campaign against land taxes |
Fun Facts
The march gained worldwide attention, with *The New York Times* giving front-page coverage.
Sarojini Naidu led the non-violent raid on the Dharasana Salt Works after Gandhi’s arrest, facing brutal police beating.
Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan’s Khudai Khidmatgars were popularly known as the Red Shirts.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Nationwide Participation in the Civil Disobedience Movement (1930–34)
The Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) (1930–34) became the broadest-based nationalist movement before independence, successfully integrating diverse sections including peasants, women, students, workers, and merchants. Different regions witnessed diverse forms of struggle, united by the common act of salt law disobedience and no-tax campaigns.
The Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) (1930–34) became the broadest-based nationalist movement before independence, successfully integrating diverse sections including peasants, women, students, workers, and merchants. Different regions witnessed diverse forms of struggle, united by the common act of salt law disobedience and no-tax campaigns.
Participation in Civil Disobedience Movement (1930–34)
| Group | Form of Participation | Key Regions/Leaders |
|---|---|---|
| Peasants | No-tax campaigns , forest satyagraha | Gujarat (Bardoli), U.P. (No-Rent) , Andhra |
| Women | Salt making, picketing liquor shops, arrests | Sarojini Naidu, Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay |
| Workers | Strikes, clashes with police | Sholapur (Parallel Admin) , Bombay, Bengal |
| Merchants/Traders | Boycott of foreign goods, swadeshi promotion | Bombay, Calcutta, Madras |
| Tribals | Defied forest laws, made salt | Maharashtra, Central Provinces, Bihar |
| NWFP | Khudai Khidmatgars (Red Shirts) | Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan |
Fun Facts
In Sholapur , workers set up their own parallel administration briefly during the strikes, demonstrating revolutionary fervor.
Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay tried to sell contraband salt at the Bombay Stock Exchange to mock British laws.
Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan’s Khudai Khidmatgars were famous for their strict adherence to non-violence.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
British Repression, Gandhi’s Arrest & Dharasana Salt Works (1930)
After the Salt March, the British responded with brutal repression. Gandhi was arrested in May 1930 before leading a raid on Dharasana Salt Works. The subsequent Dharasana Satyagraha, led by Abbas Tyabji and Sarojini Naidu, became the movement's defining moment, showcasing the moral power of non-violent defiance against colonial cruelty to the entire world.
After the Salt March, the British responded with brutal repression. Gandhi was arrested in May 1930 before leading a raid on Dharasana Salt Works. The subsequent Dharasana Satyagraha, led by Abbas Tyabji and Sarojini Naidu, became the movement's defining moment, showcasing the moral power of non-violent defiance against colonial cruelty to the entire world.
Key Events: Gandhi’s Arrest and Dharasana Satyagraha
| Date | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| 5 May 1930 | Gandhi arrested before Dharasana raid | Strategic move by British; triggered mass protests. |
| May 1930 | Dharasana Salt Satyagraha | Led by Sarojini Naidu (after Abbas Tyabji's arrest). |
| May 1930 | Brutal police repression exposed | Demonstrated non-violent defiance vs. colonial brutality. |
| June 1930 | Global reports by Webb Miller | Critical for international sympathy and shaming the British Empire. |
Fun Facts
Sarojini Naidu advised satyagrahis to 'smile and receive the blows' at Dharasana.
Webb Miller’s report was published in over 1000 newspapers worldwide.
The Dharasana incident influenced later non-violent movements, including Martin Luther King Jr.’s campaigns.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Gandhi-Irwin Pact (1931) and First Round Table Conference
The Gandhi-Irwin Pact (March 1931) temporarily suspended the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM), acknowledging the Indian National Congress (INC) as the essential negotiating party. Gandhi agreed to attend the Second Round Table Conference (RTC) in London. The First RTC (1930–31), held without Congress participation, failed to achieve any constitutional consensus.
The Gandhi-Irwin Pact (March 1931) temporarily suspended the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM), acknowledging the Indian National Congress (INC) as the essential negotiating party. Gandhi agreed to attend the Second Round Table Conference (RTC) in London. The First RTC (1930–31), held without Congress participation, failed to achieve any constitutional consensus.
First Round Table Conference (1930–31)
| Aspect | Details | Mains Link |
|---|---|---|
| Venue | St. James Palace, London | Site of British constitutional attempt |
| Participants | Princes, minority groups, British leaders; no Congress | Failed due to lack of INC representation |
| Outcome | Failed due to absence of Congress | Highlighted Congress's centrality to Indian politics |
Gandhi-Irwin Pact (1931) - Five Main Provisions
| S. No. | INC Commitment | Government Commitment |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suspend Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) | Release non-violent political prisoners |
| 2 | Attend Second Round Table Conference (RTC) | Allow right to make salt for personal use (coastal areas) |
| 3 | — | Restore confiscated properties of satyagrahis |
| 4 | — | Withdraw ordinances and end prosecutions related to CDM |
| 5 | — | Permit peaceful picketing of foreign cloth and liquor shops |
Fun Facts
Gandhi and Irwin had eight personal meetings in Delhi before signing the pact.
Many British conservatives criticized Irwin for negotiating with Gandhi as an equal.
The INC’s Karachi Session (1931) endorsed the pact despite massive popular anger over Bhagat Singh’s execution.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Second Round Table Conference (1931): Constitutional Impasse
The Second Round Table Conference (RTC) (September–December 1931) was attended by Gandhi as the sole representative of the Indian National Congress (INC) . The conference ended in failure due to irreconcilable differences over the communal question and minority representation, which the British strategically exploited to deny the demand for Purna Swaraj.
The Second Round Table Conference (RTC) (September–December 1931) was attended by Gandhi as the sole representative of the Indian National Congress (INC) . The conference ended in failure due to irreconcilable differences over the communal question and minority representation, which the British strategically exploited to deny the demand for Purna Swaraj.
Key Aspects of Second Round Table Conference
| Aspect | Details | Mains Link |
|---|---|---|
| Congress Representation | M.K. Gandhi (sole representative) | Confirmed Congress's centrality as the voice of India. |
| Key Clash | Gandhi vs. Ambedkar (over separate electorates for Depressed Classes) | Foreshadowed the Poona Pact; British exploited this division. |
| British Intent | Exploited communal disagreements | Denial of Purna Swaraj; led directly to the Communal Award (1932). |
| Outcome | Failed; no settlement reached | Gandhi relaunched Civil Disobedience Movement (1932). |
Fun Facts
Gandhi attended the London Conference dressed in his simple dhoti, shawl, and sandals, symbolizing the common Indian.
Winston Churchill mocked Gandhi as a 'half-naked fakir' .
The INC’s participation in the Second RTC was followed by the execution of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev, and Rajguru.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Communal Award (1932) and Poona Pact (1932): The Crisis of Separation
The Communal Award (August 1932) by British PM Ramsay MacDonald granted separate electorates to minorities, including the Depressed Classes. Gandhi opposed this, fearing the structural fragmentation of Hindu society, and began a fast unto death in Yerwada Jail. This moral pressure led to the Poona Pact (September 1932) between Ambedkar and Gandhi , which replaced separate electorates with reserved seats in joint electorates.
The Communal Award (August 1932) by British PM Ramsay MacDonald granted separate electorates to minorities, including the Depressed Classes. Gandhi opposed this, fearing the structural fragmentation of Hindu society, and began a fast unto death in Yerwada Jail. This moral pressure led to the Poona Pact (September 1932) between Ambedkar and Gandhi , which replaced separate electorates with reserved seats in joint electorates.
Comparison: Communal Award vs. Poona Pact
| Aspect | Communal Award (1932) | Poona Pact (1932) | Strategic Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electorate Type | Separate Electorates | Reserved Seats in Joint Electorates | Preserved Hindu electoral unity (Gandhi's goal). |
| Seats in Provincial Legislatures | 71 | 148 (More than double) | Secured greater representation for Depressed Classes (Ambedkar's gain). |
| Role of Gandhi | Opposed Award; fasted unto death | Signed Pact with Ambedkar | Demonstrated moral power overriding constitutional fiat. |
| Affirmative Action | No explicit guarantee | Adequate representation in public services assured | Institutionalized the basis for future reservation policies. |
Fun Facts
Gandhi’s fast generated immense national pressure; telegrams and appeals poured into Yerwada Jail.
Ambedkar initially resisted but agreed under severe social and political pressure, stating he had to save Gandhi’s life.
The Pact was a landmark in modern Indian history, demonstrating the power of moral protest over legal decree.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Third Round Table Conference (1932) and Outcome
The Third Round Table Conference (November–December 1932) was held in London with limited Indian participation. The Congress boycotted it as the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) had been revived. The conference failed to achieve consensus but its proceedings paved the way for the Government of India Act, 1935.
The Third Round Table Conference (November–December 1932) was held in London with limited Indian participation. The Congress boycotted it as the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) had been revived. The conference failed to achieve consensus but its proceedings paved the way for the Government of India Act, 1935.
Comparison of Three Round Table Conferences
| Conference | Year | Congress Role | Analytical Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| First | 1930–31 | Boycotted | Failed due to Congress's absence; proved INC's centrality. |
| Second | 1931 | Gandhi attended as sole representative | Failed over communal representation; led to Communal Award. |
| Third | 1932 | Boycotted | Least attended; led directly to the White Paper and GOI Act, 1935. |
Fun Facts
The Third Round Table Conference was the least attended of the three.
Even British press considered it a failure due to the absence of the Congress.
It directly paved the way for the Government of India Act, 1935—the longest Act passed by British Parliament for India.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Government of India Act, 1935: Limited Federation and Disguised Control
The Government of India Act, 1935 , was the longest and most comprehensive Act passed by the British Parliament for India. It introduced Provincial Autonomy and proposed an All-India Federation, but nationalists criticized it as a strategy to offer responsibility without transferring real power, retaining central authority firmly under the British.
The Government of India Act, 1935 , was the longest and most comprehensive Act passed by the British Parliament for India. It introduced Provincial Autonomy and proposed an All-India Federation, but nationalists criticized it as a strategy to offer responsibility without transferring real power, retaining central authority firmly under the British.
Key Features of Government of India Act, 1935
| Feature | Provision | Strategic Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Provincial Autonomy | Dyarchy abolished; responsible government introduced | Allowed Indian ministers to form governments; Governors retained veto power. |
| Central Dyarchy | Introduced at the Centre: Reserved (Defense, Foreign Affairs) vs. Transferred subjects | Ensured Viceroy’s absolute control over critical central powers. |
| Federal Proposal | Proposed All-India Federation (Provinces + Princes) | Never implemented; intended to dilute nationalist influence. |
| Institutional Foundation | Established Federal Court (1937) and RBI (1935) | Laid the permanent foundation for modern governance institutions in India. |
| Communal Division | Separate electorates extended to Depressed Classes, women, labor | A strategy to institutionalize communal divisions and fragment the nationalist movement. |
Fun Facts
It was the longest act ever passed by the British Parliament until then (321 sections, 10 schedules).
The Congress rejected the Act but decided to contest the provincial elections in 1937.
The Reserve Bank of India started operations on 1 April 1935 under this Act.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Butler Committee (1927): Relationship with Princely States
The Butler Committee (also known as the Indian States Committee), appointed in 1927, was set up to investigate the relationship between the Indian Princely States and the British Crown (Paramount Power). Its recommendations were crucial for defining the constitutional future of the Princes amidst rising nationalism.
The Butler Committee (also known as the Indian States Committee), appointed in 1927, was set up to investigate the relationship between the Indian Princely States and the British Crown (Paramount Power). Its recommendations were crucial for defining the constitutional future of the Princes amidst rising nationalism.
Butler Committee (1927) Summary
| Year | Chairman | Mandate | Key Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1927 | Sir Harcourt Butler | Examine Paramountcy and financial relations with Princely States. | Paramountcy must not be transferred to a future Indian government without Princes’ consent. |
Fun Facts
The term Paramountcy was deliberately kept vague by the British to allow them maximum flexibility in dealing with the Princes.
The AISPC (All India States’ People’s Conference) was the counter-movement that pushed for democratic rights within the autocratic Princely States.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Irwin Declaration (1929) and Delhi Manifesto (1929)
The Irwin Declaration (October 1929), promising Dominion Status as the natural goal for India, was a political maneuver aimed at pacifying nationalist sentiment following the Simon Commission boycott. It was immediately challenged by the Delhi Manifesto (November 1929), which laid down the conditions for Congress’s cooperation with the British.
The Irwin Declaration (October 1929), promising Dominion Status as the natural goal for India, was a political maneuver aimed at pacifying nationalist sentiment following the Simon Commission boycott. It was immediately challenged by the Delhi Manifesto (November 1929), which laid down the conditions for Congress’s cooperation with the British.
- The RTC should be convened to formulate a scheme for Dominion Status (not just to discuss it).
- The Congress should be given majority representation at the conference.
- There must be a general amnesty for all political prisoners (including those sentenced in the Meerut case).
Irwin Declaration vs. Delhi Manifesto
| Aspect | Irwin Declaration (British) | Delhi Manifesto (INC Response) |
|---|---|---|
| Date | Oct 1929 | Nov 1929 |
| Core Promise | Dominion Status is the 'natural and eventual' goal. | RTC must formulate a scheme for immediate Dominion Status. |
| Key Demand | Proposed a Round Table Conference (RTC). | Demand for amnesty for political prisoners and majority Congress representation at RTC. |
| Outcome | Conditions rejected by Irwin. | Led directly to the Purna Swaraj demand at the Lahore Session. |
Fun Facts
The Irwin Declaration was seen by the British government as a major constitutional gesture, but the Indian response proved how far nationalist demands had advanced beyond Dominion Status.
The Declaration and the Manifesto represented the last major exchange between the British and Congress Moderates before the shift to mass Civil Disobedience.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Karachi Congress Session (1931): Fundamental Rights and NCM Review
The Karachi Session of 1931, presided over by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, was one of the most significant INC sessions. It was held immediately after the Gandhi-Irwin Pact and the execution of Bhagat Singh and his comrades. It formally endorsed the Pact and, crucially, passed resolutions on Fundamental Rights and the National Economic Programme.
The Karachi Session of 1931, presided over by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, was one of the most significant INC sessions. It was held immediately after the Gandhi-Irwin Pact and the execution of Bhagat Singh and his comrades. It formally endorsed the Pact and, crucially, passed resolutions on Fundamental Rights and the National Economic Programme.
- Free expression, freedom of association, and freedom of conscience.
- Universal adult franchise.
- Equality before the law.
- Free and compulsory primary education.
- State ownership of key industries and transport.
- Protection for industrial workers (living wage, limited work hours).
- Rights for peasants (substantial reduction in rent and revenue).
Karachi Session (1931) Key Outcomes
| Resolution | Key Feature | Legacy |
|---|---|---|
| Gandhi-Irwin Pact | Formally endorsed the pact. | Confirmed Gandhi's leadership despite controversy. |
| Fundamental Rights | Guaranteed civil liberties, equality, and universal adult franchise. | Became the basis for the Fundamental Rights in the 1950 Constitution. |
| National Economic Programme | Proposals for state control of industries and workers’ rights. | Established the socialist and secular tone of the Congress. |
Fun Facts
Despite the massive public pressure, Gandhi's decision to support the Gandhi-Irwin Pact was highly political, aiming to keep the Congress united for the RTC.
The Fundamental Rights resolution was a major commitment to socialism and democracy, distinguishing the INC from the purely constitutional demands of the Moderates.
Mains Key Points
Prelims Strategy Tips
Chapter Complete!
Ready to move to the next chapter?
