International Relations · UPSC Notes

    International Institutions and Global Regimes — UPSC International Relations Notes

    Free, exam-focused notes for UPSC Prelims and Mains, with Prelims tips and Mains points for every topic. 6 topics.

    Open in the interactive reader: bookmarks, progress tracking and read-aloud.

    The United Nations System: Organs, Agencies, Peacekeeping and India

    The United Nations, created by the UN Charter (signed at San Francisco on 26 June 1945, in force on 24 October 1945), is the core of the post-war multilateral order with 193 member states. It works through six principal organs, a family of specialised agencies, funds and programmes. India, an original member, is one of the largest contributors to UN peacekeeping and argues for 'reformed multilateralism' as the UN faces a funding crunch and veto paralysis.

    1. Origins and Purposes

    Successor to the League of Nations (1920), which failed to prevent the Second World War; the name 'United Nations' was first used in the Declaration by United Nations (1 January 1942), which India signed.

    Article 1 purposes: maintain international peace and security, develop friendly relations based on equal rights and self-determination, achieve cooperation on economic, social and humanitarian problems, and promote human rights.

    Key principles: sovereign equality, peaceful settlement of disputes, prohibition of the threat or use of force (Article 2(4)) and non-intervention in domestic matters (Article 2(7)); the inherent right of self-defence is preserved by Article 51.

    2. The Six Principal Organs

    General Assembly (UNGA): All 193 members, one vote each; important questions need a two-thirds majority; resolutions are recommendatory except on budget and internal matters.

    Security Council (UNSC): 15 members, 5 permanent with veto; its decisions under Chapter VII (sanctions, use of force) bind all members.

    Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC): 54 members elected for three years; coordinates economic, social and development work and grants consultative status to NGOs.

    Trusteeship Council: Suspended operations in 1994 after Palau, the last trust territory, became independent.

    International Court of Justice (ICJ): At The Hague; 15 judges elected for nine years by the UNGA and UNSC; decides disputes between states and gives advisory opinions (India won the Kulbhushan Jadhav case against Pakistan in 2019).

    Secretariat: Headed by the Secretary-General, appointed by the UNGA on the UNSC's recommendation for a five-year term; António Guterres's second term ends on 31 December 2026.

    3. Specialised Agencies, Funds and Programmes

    Specialised agencies are autonomous bodies linked by agreement with ECOSOC: e.g. ILO (1919, Geneva), FAO (Rome), UNESCO (Paris), WHO (Geneva), ICAO (Montreal), IMO (London), ITU (Geneva), WIPO (Geneva), IFAD (Rome); the IMF and World Bank are also specialised agencies.

    Funds and programmes report to the UNGA/ECOSOC: UNDP, UNICEF, UNEP (Nairobi), WFP, UNFPA, UNHCR, UN-Habitat; related organisations include the IAEA and the WTO.

    4. UN Peacekeeping and India

    Peacekeeping is not named in the Charter; it rests between Chapter VI (peaceful settlement) and Chapter VII, hence called 'Chapter VI and a half'. Principles: consent of parties, impartiality, and non-use of force except in self-defence and defence of the mandate.

    India has taken part in peacekeeping since the Korean War (1950s) and is among the largest cumulative troop contributors; it deployed the first all-women Formed Police Unit in Liberia (2007) and runs the Centre for UN Peacekeeping in New Delhi.

    India's concerns: troop-contributing countries have little say in drafting mandates; safety of peacekeepers; mandates often exceed resources.

    5. India at the UN

    Raised apartheid in South Africa (1946) and pushed decolonisation and disarmament; championed the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (proposed 1996, still not adopted because states disagree on defining terrorism).

    Eight terms on the UNSC (most recently 2021–22, when it chaired the Counter-Terrorism Committee in 2022); the International Day of Yoga (21 June) and the International Year of Millets (2023) were adopted on India's proposals.

    6. Challenges Facing the UN

    Veto paralysis over Ukraine and Gaza; the 'veto initiative' (UNGA resolution, April 2022) now requires the Assembly to meet whenever a veto is cast. The 'Uniting for Peace' resolution (1950) lets the UNGA act when the UNSC is deadlocked.

    Financial strain from unpaid or delayed assessed contributions and cuts in voluntary funding, which led the Secretary-General to launch the UN80 Initiative (2025) for efficiency and restructuring.

    Rise of minilaterals and great-power rivalry; a legitimacy gap because the UNSC reflects 1945 power realities (see the topic on UN reforms).

    Practice

    UPSC-style: 'The United Nations has been more successful as a forum for development cooperation than as a guarantor of peace.' Critically examine with reference to India's experience.

    Principal organs of the UN
    OrganMembershipKey function
    General AssemblyAll 193 membersDeliberation, budget, elections
    Security Council15 (5 permanent)Peace and security; binding decisions
    ECOSOC54Economic and social coordination
    Trusteeship CouncilPermanent membersSuspended since 1994
    ICJ15 judgesInter-state disputes, advisory opinions
    SecretariatSecretary-General and staffAdministration and implementation

    Prelims tips

    • UN Charter signed 26 June 1945; UN Day is 24 October (Charter came into force).
    • Six principal organs; the Trusteeship Council has been suspended since 1994.
    • Only UNSC decisions under Chapter VII are binding on all members; UNGA resolutions are generally recommendatory.
    • ICJ sits at The Hague with 15 judges serving nine-year terms. Do not confuse it with the International Criminal Court (ICC), which India has not joined.
    • Headquarters: UNEP – Nairobi; FAO, IFAD, WFP – Rome; UNESCO – Paris; ICAO – Montreal; IMO – London.
    • 'Uniting for Peace' (1950) lets the General Assembly recommend collective measures when the UNSC is deadlocked by veto.

    Mains points

    • The UN's founding bargain gave great powers a veto in return for their participation; the same bargain now produces paralysis in conflicts involving the P5 or their partners.
    • Successes lie in decolonisation, humanitarian relief, health (smallpox eradication), standard-setting and the SDGs; failures in Rwanda, Srebrenica, Syria and Gaza dent its credibility as a security provider.
    • For India, the UN offers a platform for Global South leadership, counter-terrorism norms and peacekeeping diplomacy, but exclusion from permanent membership limits its influence.
    • Financial dependence on a few large contributors makes the UN vulnerable to their policy shifts; broader burden-sharing and efficiency reforms are needed.
    • Way forward: reformed multilateralism—UNSC expansion, a stronger General Assembly, safer and better-resourced peacekeeping, and an agreed definition of terrorism.

    Did you know?

    • India signed the 1942 Declaration by United Nations and the 1945 Charter while still under British rule, making it one of the 51 original members.
    • Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit became the first woman President of the UN General Assembly in 1953.
    • UN peacekeepers, called 'Blue Helmets', received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1988.

    World Trade Organization (WTO) and India: Food Security, Fisheries and Dispute Settlement

    The WTO (1 January 1995), successor to the GATT (1947), sets and enforces the rules of global trade through the Marrakesh Agreement, with the Ministerial Conference as its top body and decisions by consensus. India's key interests are a permanent solution on public stockholding for food security, fair fisheries subsidies rules that protect small fishers, special and differential treatment, and restoring the paralysed Appellate Body. The 14th Ministerial Conference (MC14) at Yaoundé, Cameroon (March 2026) did not settle these issues.

    1. From GATT to WTO

    GATT (1947) was a provisional agreement on goods; eight rounds of talks cut tariffs. The Uruguay Round (1986–94) created the WTO, covering goods (GATT 1994), services (GATS), intellectual property (TRIPS) and investment measures (TRIMs).

    Headquarters in Geneva; 166 members; India is a founding member of both GATT and the WTO.

    Core principles: Most-Favoured-Nation (non-discrimination between trading partners), National Treatment (no discrimination between imported and domestic goods), binding of tariffs, transparency, and special and differential treatment (S&DT) for developing countries.

    2. Agriculture and Public Stockholding

    The Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) classifies subsidies into boxes: Amber (trade-distorting, capped), Blue (production-limiting) and Green (minimally distorting, not capped).

    Developing countries may give Amber Box support up to a de minimis level of 10% of the value of production. India's MSP procurement counts as market price support, calculated against an outdated 1986–88 external reference price, which inflates the measured subsidy.

    The Bali 'Peace Clause' (MC9, 2013), made open-ended by a 2014 General Council decision, shields public stockholding programmes from legal challenge until a permanent solution is found; India first invoked it for rice in 2020.

    India also seeks a Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM) to protect farmers against import surges; at MC14 it again pressed for a permanent solution and the SSM without success.

    3. Fisheries Subsidies

    The Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies (MC12, Geneva, 2022) bans subsidies for illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, fishing of overfished stocks and fishing on the unregulated high seas; it entered into force in September 2025.

    The second phase on subsidies causing overcapacity and overfishing remains unfinished. India wants big distant-water fishing nations to bear the main burden, a 25-year transition for developing countries and a permanent carve-out for small-scale and artisanal fishers. At MC14 members only agreed to keep negotiating towards MC15.

    4. Dispute Settlement Crisis

    The two-tier system (panels plus a seven-member Appellate Body) has been crippled since December 2019, when US blocking of appointments left the Body without a quorum; appeals now go 'into the void'.

    Some members use the interim MPIA (Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement); India has not joined it and wants the Appellate Body restored.

    India's notable disputes: the US challenge to India's solar mission local-content rules (India lost, 2016); sugar subsidy cases by Brazil, Australia and Guatemala (panel ruled against India in 2021; India appealed); EU and others on ICT tariffs.

    5. Other Issues for India

    E-commerce moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions: India argues it costs developing countries tariff revenue and policy space.

    Plurilaterals such as Investment Facilitation for Development: India opposes bringing them into the WTO without consensus, as this undermines multilateralism.

    Non-trade issues such as labour and environment standards and carbon border taxes (e.g. the EU's CBAM) are seen by India as disguised protectionism.

    India co-sponsored with South Africa (2020) the proposal for a TRIPS waiver on COVID-19 vaccines; MC12 agreed a narrower waiver for vaccine patents.

    Practice

    UPSC-style: 'The WTO's crisis is a crisis of multilateralism itself.' Discuss India's stakes in reviving the WTO, with reference to public stockholding and dispute settlement.

    Recent WTO Ministerial Conferences
    ConferenceVenue and yearKey outcome
    MC9Bali, 2013Trade Facilitation Agreement; interim Peace Clause on stockholding
    MC10Nairobi, 2015Elimination of agricultural export subsidies
    MC12Geneva, 2022Fisheries subsidies agreement; TRIPS waiver for vaccines
    MC13Abu Dhabi, 2024Accession of Comoros and Timor-Leste; little progress on agriculture
    MC14Yaoundé, 2026No permanent solution on stockholding; fisheries talks continue to MC15

    Prelims tips

    • WTO came into existence on 1 January 1995 through the Marrakesh Agreement; HQ Geneva.
    • Green Box subsidies are not capped; Amber Box support of developing countries is capped at 10% de minimis.
    • Peace Clause: agreed at Bali (2013), made open-ended in 2014; protects public stockholding for food security.
    • Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies: adopted at MC12 (2022), in force from September 2025.
    • The Appellate Body has been non-functional since December 2019; India is not part of the MPIA.
    • MC14 was held in Yaoundé, Cameroon, in March 2026; MC13 in Abu Dhabi (2024).

    Mains points

    • Public stockholding is a livelihood and food-security issue for India (NFSA covers about 80 crore people), not a trade-distorting export strategy; outdated price benchmarks make the rules unfair to developing countries.
    • Without a working Appellate Body, rulings can be blocked by appeal, weakening rule-based trade and encouraging unilateral tariffs and retaliation.
    • Fisheries rules must balance ocean sustainability with equity: India's subsidies per fisher are small compared with the industrial fleets of developed nations.
    • The shift to bilateral FTAs (UAE, Australia, EFTA, UK, EU) shows India hedging as the WTO stalls, but India still needs multilateral rules as a shield against powerful economies.
    • Way forward: a permanent solution on stockholding, restored two-tier dispute settlement, protection of consensus-based decision-making and S&DT, and coalition-building with the G33 and the African Group.

    Did you know?

    • MC14 was only the second WTO Ministerial Conference held in Africa, after Nairobi in 2015.
    • The Doha Development Round launched in 2001 has never been formally concluded.
    • Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala of Nigeria became the first woman and first African to head the WTO in 2021.

    IMF and World Bank: Bretton Woods Institutions, Quota Reform and India

    The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank were created at the Bretton Woods Conference (July 1944). The IMF safeguards global monetary stability and lends to countries in balance-of-payments crises; the World Bank finances development. Voting power follows quotas/shareholding, giving the US an effective veto over major IMF decisions. India seeks quota realignment that reflects emerging economies' weight and reform of multilateral development banks (MDBs), a priority of its 2023 G20 presidency.

    1. IMF: Role and Structure

    HQ in Washington, D.C.; 191 members. Functions: surveillance (Article IV consultations, World Economic Outlook), lending (Stand-By Arrangements, Extended Fund Facility, Rapid Financing Instrument) and capacity development.

    A member's quota decides its subscription, its voting power and its access to financing. Major decisions need an 85% supermajority; the US, with about 16.5% of votes, can block them.

    Special Drawing Rights (SDR): an international reserve asset valued on a basket of five currencies—US dollar, euro, Chinese renminbi, Japanese yen and British pound. A general SDR allocation of about USD 650 billion was made in 2021 to fight the COVID-19 shock.

    By convention the IMF Managing Director is a European and the World Bank President an American—an arrangement emerging economies criticise.

    2. Quota Reform

    The 14th General Review (2010), effective only in 2016 after US Congressional delay, shifted about 6% of quota share to dynamic emerging economies; India entered the top ten shareholders.

    India's quota share is about 2.75%, far below its share of world GDP in purchasing-power terms. India heads a constituency with Bangladesh, Bhutan and Sri Lanka on the Executive Board.

    The 16th General Review (December 2023) agreed a uniform 50% quota increase without changing shares. It needs consent from members holding 85% of quotas; as of late 2025 consents were short of that threshold and the deadline was extended. Realignment of shares was deferred to future reviews.

    3. World Bank Group

    Five institutions: IBRD (loans to middle-income countries), IDA (concessional loans and grants to the poorest), IFC (private sector), MIGA (political-risk guarantees) and ICSID (investment disputes). India is a member of all except ICSID.

    India was historically the largest cumulative borrower from IDA and graduated from IDA in 2014; it now borrows from the IBRD and contributes to IDA.

    The World Bank Evolution Roadmap (from 2023) adds climate, pandemics and other global public goods to its mission of ending extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity on a liveable planet.

    4. India and the Bretton Woods Institutions

    The 1991 balance-of-payments crisis led India to IMF support, linked to stabilisation and structural reforms (liberalisation, privatisation, globalisation). India has not needed an IMF programme since.

    Under its G20 presidency (2023), India commissioned an Independent Expert Group (co-convened by Lawrence Summers and N.K. Singh) on strengthening MDBs, which called for much larger lending capacity and a 'triple agenda' of ending extreme poverty, boosting shared prosperity and providing global public goods.

    India also backs institutions that complement the Bretton Woods system: the BRICS New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), where India is the second-largest shareholder after China.

    5. Criticisms

    Conditionality (austerity, privatisation) under the 'Washington Consensus' was blamed for social costs in Latin America, Africa and the 1997 Asian crisis.

    Governance deficit: under-representation of Asia and Africa; the leadership convention; slow quota reform.

    Debt distress in low-income countries (Zambia, Ghana) and the Sri Lankan default show the slow working of the G20 Common Framework and debt restructuring.

    Practice

    UPSC-style: 'Reform of the Bretton Woods institutions is essential for their legitimacy in a multipolar world.' Examine India's position.

    IMF and World Bank compared
    FeatureIMFWorld Bank
    Main aimMonetary and financial stabilityLong-term development and poverty reduction
    Typical lendingShort to medium term, for balance-of-payments needsProject and policy loans, long term
    Head by conventionEuropeanAmerican
    Voting basisQuotasShareholding
    Flagship reportWorld Economic OutlookWorld Development Report

    Prelims tips

    • Bretton Woods Conference: July 1944, New Hampshire, USA; both institutions are headquartered in Washington, D.C.
    • SDR basket: US dollar, euro, renminbi, yen, pound (renminbi added in 2016).
    • Major IMF decisions need 85% of votes, giving the US an effective veto.
    • 16th General Review of Quotas (2023): 50% uniform increase, no change in shares.
    • India is not a member of ICSID; it graduated from IDA in 2014.
    • World Economic Outlook and Global Financial Stability Report are IMF reports; the World Development Report is a World Bank report.

    Mains points

    • Quota shares lag behind economic realities: emerging markets drive most global growth but hold a minority of votes, eroding the institutions' legitimacy.
    • The rise of the NDB, AIIB and bilateral swap lines shows fragmentation of the global financial safety net; India's interest lies in reforming, not replacing, the Bretton Woods system.
    • Climate finance needs run into trillions; MDB capital adequacy reform and private capital mobilisation are essential for developing countries' energy transition.
    • India's own experience (from the 1991 crisis to large reserves) shows how IMF support can enable reform when it is nationally owned rather than imposed.
    • Way forward: quota realignment in the next review, merit-based selection of leaders, faster debt restructuring and larger concessional finance for low-income countries.

    Did you know?

    • C.D. Deshmukh, later the first Indian Governor of the RBI, was part of India's delegation at Bretton Woods in 1944.
    • Gita Gopinath became the first woman Chief Economist of the IMF in 2019.
    • Ajay Banga, born in Pune, became World Bank President in 2023.

    WHO, Global Health Governance and the Pandemic Agreement

    The World Health Organization (WHO), a UN specialised agency founded on 7 April 1948 (World Health Day) in Geneva, directs and coordinates international health work. COVID-19 exposed gaps in early warning, vaccine equity and compliance, leading to amended International Health Regulations (IHR) and the WHO Pandemic Agreement, adopted by the World Health Assembly in May 2025. Its annex on Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) was still under negotiation after the May 2026 Assembly. The US withdrawal, effective January 2026, has strained WHO's finances.

    1. Structure and Functions

    World Health Assembly (WHA): All member states; meets every May in Geneva; elects the Director-General and approves the budget. Executive Board: 34 health experts. Six regional offices; the South-East Asia Regional Office (SEARO) is in New Delhi.

    Functions: setting norms and standards, declaring Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC), prequalifying vaccines and medicines, the Essential Medicines List, and campaigns such as smallpox eradication (certified 1980) and polio eradication.

    Funding: assessed contributions (membership dues) form a small share; most funds are voluntary and earmarked by donors, which limits WHO's independence. Members agreed in 2022 to raise assessed contributions gradually to half the base budget.

    2. International Health Regulations (IHR)

    The IHR (2005) are binding rules requiring states to build surveillance capacity and report events that may be a PHEIC.

    2024 amendments (in force from September 2025) add a higher alert level, the 'pandemic emergency', stress equitable access to health products, and set up National IHR Authorities.

    3. The WHO Pandemic Agreement

    Adopted by the 78th WHA on 20 May 2025 under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution—only the second such treaty after the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (2003).

    Key elements: a One Health approach to prevention, technology transfer on mutually agreed terms, a global supply chain and logistics network, and a target that manufacturers make about 20% of real-time production of vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics available to WHO during a pandemic (half as donations).

    It explicitly does not give WHO power to order lockdowns, vaccine mandates or travel bans—national sovereignty is preserved.

    The treaty opens for signature only after the PABS annex (sharing pathogen samples and genetic data in return for fair sharing of benefits such as vaccines) is adopted. The 79th WHA (May 2026) did not finalise it and extended negotiations, with the result to go to the 80th WHA or an earlier special session.

    4. US Withdrawal and Funding Crisis

    The US, historically WHO's largest donor, announced withdrawal in January 2025; it took effect in January 2026. WHO has cut its budget and staff and is seeking new donors.

    5. India and Global Health

    The 'pharmacy of the world': a major supplier of generic medicines and vaccines; Vaccine Maitri (2021) supplied COVID-19 vaccines to many countries, and India backed COVAX.

    Hosts the WHO Global Centre for Traditional Medicine at Jamnagar, Gujarat (foundation stone laid in 2022), the first such global centre.

    India's priorities: equitable access, technology transfer and local manufacturing, protecting the TRIPS flexibilities that sustain its generics industry, and a balanced PABS system.

    Domestic links: Pradhan Mantri Ayushman Bharat Health Infrastructure Mission and the National One Health Mission; WHO validated India as having eliminated trachoma as a public health problem in 2024.

    Practice

    UPSC-style: 'COVID-19 showed that global health security is only as strong as its weakest link.' Evaluate the WHO Pandemic Agreement in this light.

    Key global health instruments
    InstrumentYearPurpose
    WHO Constitution1948Founding treaty of WHO
    Framework Convention on Tobacco Control2003First treaty under Article 19
    International Health Regulations2005 (amended 2024)Surveillance, reporting, PHEIC and pandemic emergency
    Pandemic Agreement2025Prevention, preparedness, equitable response

    Prelims tips

    • WHO founded 7 April 1948 (World Health Day); HQ Geneva; SEARO in New Delhi.
    • Pandemic Agreement adopted on 20 May 2025 by the 78th World Health Assembly under Article 19.
    • The Pandemic Agreement opens for signature only after the PABS annex is adopted.
    • IHR 2024 amendments created a new 'pandemic emergency' alert level above PHEIC.
    • WHO Global Centre for Traditional Medicine is at Jamnagar, Gujarat—the first of its kind.
    • The US withdrawal from WHO took effect in January 2026.

    Mains points

    • WHO's dependence on earmarked voluntary funds lets donors set priorities; sustainable financing is a precondition for independent technical leadership.
    • The Pandemic Agreement's real test is the PABS bargain: developing countries share pathogens only if they are assured fair access to the vaccines and drugs made from them.
    • Vaccine nationalism during COVID-19 showed that intellectual property and manufacturing concentration are equity issues; India's generics and vaccine capacity make it a natural voice for the Global South.
    • Major-power withdrawals weaken universal health governance and push countries towards regional and bilateral arrangements, risking gaps in disease surveillance.
    • Way forward: early adoption of PABS, stronger domestic surveillance under One Health, regional manufacturing hubs and predictable WHO financing.

    Did you know?

    • The WHO Constitution defines health as 'a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity'.
    • Smallpox is the only human disease ever eradicated; WHO certified it in 1980.
    • WHO declared India polio-free in 2014.

    The Global Nuclear Order: IAEA, NPT, CTBT and India's Position

    The global nuclear order rests on the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT, 1968), the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards system and test-ban norms such as the CTBT (1996). India has stayed out of the NPT and CTBT, calling them discriminatory, yet built a record as a responsible nuclear power: a No First Use doctrine, a test moratorium since 1998, and the 2008 NSG waiver for civil nuclear trade. The order is under stress—the 2026 NPT Review Conference ended without a final document and US–Russia arms control has collapsed.

    1. The IAEA

    Set up in 1957 (inspired by Eisenhower's 'Atoms for Peace' speech, 1953); HQ Vienna; reports to the UNGA and UNSC. India is a founding member.

    Roles: promoting peaceful uses (power, medicine, agriculture), nuclear safety and security, and safeguards—inspections to verify that nuclear material is not diverted to weapons.

    India signed an India-specific Safeguards Agreement (2008) covering civilian facilities it chose to declare, and its Additional Protocol entered into force in 2014; military facilities remain outside safeguards.

    2. The NPT

    Opened for signature in 1968, in force from 1970, made permanent in 1995; nearly universal (191 parties). Recognises only five nuclear-weapon states—those that tested before 1 January 1967 (US, Russia, UK, France, China).

    Three pillars: non-proliferation, disarmament (Article VI obliges good-faith negotiations) and peaceful use of nuclear energy.

    Non-parties: India, Pakistan, Israel and South Sudan; North Korea announced withdrawal in 2003.

    Review Conferences every five years: the last consensus outcome was in 2010; the 2015, 2022 and 2026 conferences all ended without a final document (the 2026 meeting closed in May amid disputes over disarmament and Iran).

    3. CTBT and Other Instruments

    CTBT (1996) bans all nuclear explosions, but has not entered into force because several of the 44 'Annex 2' states (including the US, China, India and Pakistan) have not ratified or signed it. The CTBTO's International Monitoring System is already working.

    Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW, 2017): in force since January 2021; no nuclear-armed state, including India, has joined.

    A Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT) has been stalled for decades at the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva; India supports negotiating a non-discriminatory, verifiable FMCT there.

    New START, the last US–Russia treaty limiting strategic arsenals, expired in February 2026 without a replacement.

    4. India's Position and Doctrine

    India rejects the NPT and CTBT as creating 'nuclear apartheid'—a permanent division into haves and have-nots—while backing universal, non-discriminatory disarmament (Rajiv Gandhi Action Plan, 1988).

    Tests: Pokhran-I (1974), described as a 'peaceful nuclear explosion', and Pokhran-II (1998), after which India declared a voluntary moratorium on testing.

    Nuclear doctrine (2003): credible minimum deterrence; No First Use, with no use against non-nuclear-weapon states; massive retaliation causing unacceptable damage; civilian control through the Nuclear Command Authority (Political Council chaired by the Prime Minister); the option of a nuclear response to a major biological or chemical attack.

    Mainstreaming: India–US civil nuclear deal (2005–08) and the NSG waiver (September 2008) allowed civil nuclear trade without NPT membership; agreements followed with France, Russia, Canada, Australia, Kazakhstan and Japan.

    India has completed its nuclear triad with the SSBN INS Arihant, and passed the WMD Act (2005) to control proliferation-sensitive exports.

    Practice

    UPSC-style: 'India's non-signature of the NPT has not prevented its integration into the global nuclear order.' Discuss.

    Key nuclear treaties and India
    TreatyYearStatusIndia
    Partial Test Ban Treaty1963In force; bans tests in air, space, underwaterParty
    NPT1968In force since 1970Not a party
    CTBT1996Not in forceNot signed; voluntary moratorium
    TPNW2017In force since 2021Not a party
    Convention on Nuclear Safety1994In forceParty

    Prelims tips

    • IAEA: est. 1957, HQ Vienna; India is a founding member.
    • NPT nuclear-weapon states are those that tested before 1 January 1967.
    • NPT non-parties: India, Pakistan, Israel, South Sudan; North Korea announced withdrawal in 2003.
    • CTBT needs ratification by all 44 Annex 2 states to enter into force.
    • India's nuclear doctrine (2003): credible minimum deterrence, No First Use, civilian control via the Nuclear Command Authority.
    • NSG waiver for India: September 2008; India's IAEA Additional Protocol in force since 2014.

    Mains points

    • The NPT's bargain—non-proliferation in return for disarmament and peaceful use—is fraying because nuclear-weapon states have not met Article VI commitments, and are now modernising arsenals.
    • India's case shows that a non-NPT state can be integrated through an exceptional route (2008 waiver) based on its non-proliferation record, a model China resists extending to India in the NSG.
    • The end of US–Russia treaty limits, China's rapid arsenal growth and crises over Iran's programme raise the risk of a new arms race, which affects India's security calculus with China and Pakistan.
    • No First Use strengthens stability and India's image, though debates continue on its credibility against tactical nuclear threats from Pakistan.
    • Civil nuclear energy is vital for India's net-zero 2070 goal; the Nuclear Energy Mission and small modular reactors depend on fuel and technology access opened by the 2008 waiver.

    Did you know?

    • Pokhran-I (18 May 1974) was code-named 'Smiling Buddha'.
    • The 1998 tests were named Operation Shakti; 11 May is observed as National Technology Day.
    • The IAEA and its then Director General Mohamed ElBaradei shared the 2005 Nobel Peace Prize.

    Export Control Regimes: NSG, MTCR, Wassenaar Arrangement and Australia Group

    Four multilateral export control regimes coordinate national controls on items that could help build weapons of mass destruction or destabilising conventional arms. They are informal, voluntary, consensus-based groups, not treaties. India joined the MTCR (2016), the Wassenaar Arrangement (2017) and the Australia Group (2018), but its bid for the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) is blocked, mainly by China, which insists on NPT membership.

    1. Why Export Controls Matter

    Many technologies are dual-use: valves, centrifuges, rocket engines, chemicals and software used in civilian industry can also serve weapons programmes. Regimes share control lists and information so that suppliers deny such items to proliferators.

    Decisions are by consensus; guidelines are implemented through each member's national laws. Membership signals that a country is a trusted supplier and eases access to high technology.

    2. Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG)

    Formed in 1974–75 (first met in London, hence the 'London Club') as a reaction to India's 1974 nuclear test; 48 participating governments.

    Controls nuclear materials, equipment and technology (Part 1) and nuclear-related dual-use items (Part 2); requires full-scope safeguards for supplies to non-nuclear-weapon states.

    The September 2008 'clean waiver' exempted India from the full-scope safeguards requirement. India applied for membership in May 2016; China (with a few others earlier) opposes admission of non-NPT states without agreed criteria, often linking India's bid to Pakistan's.

    3. Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)

    Created in 1987 by the G7 to limit the spread of unmanned delivery systems for WMD; covers missiles and drones able to carry a 500 kg payload over 300 km (Category I).

    India became the 35th member in June 2016. Benefits: easier access to high-end missile and drone technology (e.g. armed drones from the US) and the ability to export systems like BrahMos (sold to the Philippines). China is not a member.

    India also subscribed to the Hague Code of Conduct against ballistic missile proliferation (2016).

    4. Wassenaar Arrangement

    Set up in 1996 (successor to the Cold War CoCom), Secretariat in Vienna; covers conventional arms and dual-use goods and technologies through Munitions and Dual-Use Lists.

    India joined in December 2017 as the 42nd participating state. China is not a member.

    5. Australia Group

    Formed in 1985 after Iraq's use of chemical weapons in the Iran–Iraq war; harmonises controls on chemical and biological weapons precursors and equipment, supporting the Chemical Weapons Convention (1993) and Biological Weapons Convention (1972).

    India joined in January 2018 as the 43rd participant.

    6. India's National System

    The SCOMET list (Special Chemicals, Organisms, Materials, Equipment and Technologies) under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, and the WMD and their Delivery Systems Act, 2005 (amended 2022 to criminalise financing of WMD) align India with regime lists.

    The US granted India Strategic Trade Authorisation-1 (STA-1) status in 2018, partly because of its membership of three of the four regimes.

    Practice

    UPSC-style: 'Membership of export control regimes is as much about technology access as about non-proliferation.' Discuss with reference to India's NSG bid.

    Export control regimes at a glance
    RegimeFoundedCoversIndia
    NSG1974–75Nuclear materials and technologyNot a member (2008 waiver; applied 2016)
    MTCR1987Missiles and dronesMember, 2016
    Wassenaar Arrangement1996Conventional arms, dual-use goodsMember, 2017
    Australia Group1985Chemical and biological weapons itemsMember, 2018

    Prelims tips

    • India joined MTCR (June 2016), Wassenaar (December 2017) and the Australia Group (January 2018).
    • NSG was formed after India's 1974 test; India is not a member but received a waiver in 2008.
    • China is a member of the NSG but not of the MTCR, Wassenaar Arrangement or Australia Group.
    • MTCR Category I: missiles capable of carrying 500 kg over 300 km.
    • These regimes are informal and non-binding; they are not treaties and have no enforcement body.
    • SCOMET is India's national control list for dual-use exports.

    Mains points

    • India's entry into three regimes despite staying outside the NPT reflects a shift from treating it as a target of controls to recognising it as a responsible stakeholder.
    • NSG membership would give India a voice in writing nuclear trade rules and greater certainty for fuel and reactor supplies, supporting its goal of expanding nuclear power.
    • China's consensus veto shows how great-power rivalry penetrates technical bodies; India's MTCR membership (where China is outside) gives it some diplomatic leverage.
    • Emerging technologies—AI chips, quantum, drones—are increasingly controlled through US-led unilateral and plurilateral measures, so India must align its controls to gain access while protecting its own industry.
    • Way forward: build support for criteria-based admission of non-NPT states to the NSG, strengthen SCOMET enforcement and grow defence exports within regime rules.

    Did you know?

    • The Wassenaar Arrangement is named after a suburb of The Hague where it was agreed in 1995.
    • The Australia Group takes its name from Australia's initiative in convening the first meeting in 1985.
    • The NSG, created in response to India's test, gave India a special waiver 33 years later.

    International Relations: All chapters

    1. India and Its Neighbourhood
    2. India and Major Powers
    3. Indo-Pacific and Global Institutions
    4. Foundations of India's Foreign Policy
    5. Regional and Multilateral Groupings
    6. International Institutions and Global Regimes

    Practise chapter-wise tests →